Thursday, 9 October 2014
20 Things You Didn't Know About... Superstition
Knock on wood or not, superstition appears to have played a positive role in evolution and it continues to affect human behavior. Lucky us.
By Rebecca Coffey|Tuesday, December 17, 2013
1.
Modern Halloween celebrations focus on fun frights, but superstitions
associated with the holiday’s ancestor, the Celtic festival of the dead,
were no laughing matter. Families left “treats” for departed loved ones
to discourage nasty “tricks” from beyond the grave.
2. On Halloween, 18th-century Scottish
villagers drove sheep through hoops of rowan branches to protect them
from ghostly mischief, including sickness.
3. The ritual may have arisen from
observing that sheep nibbling rowanberries were healthier; the berries
contain sorbic acid, which has anti-fungal properties.
4. Dowsers believe the forked rod or
pendulum they hold vibrates as they pass over underground water, but
there’s no science to support the notion. In fact, as early as the 19th
century, dowsing doubters such as French chemist Michel Eugène Chevreul
suggested the vibrations came from intentional muscle movements.
5. The German government tested 500
dowsers in the 1980s. Six “showed an extraordinarily high rate of
success, which can scarcely if at all be explained as due to chance,”
the study says.
6. In further tests, they could not replicate their “extraordinary” results. Oops.
7. Evolutionary biologist Kevin Foster defines superstitions as incorrect identifications of causal links.
8. Foster doesn’t consider “superstition” pejorative: You don’t need to understand cause to benefit from a behavior.
9. Believing that rustling grass always
means a predator is approaching, for example, means you’ll hoof it
whenever you hear the sound, whether it’s caused by wind or a hungry
lion.
10. You’ll live to share your
superstition with your children, they’ll tell their children and so on,
protecting your progeny from grass-rustling lions. Foster believes that,
among early humans, natural selection favored the superstitious.
11. Superstition can still be a plus —
sort of. German researchers reported in 2010 that the more strongly
participants believed in their good luck charms, the more confident they
were.
12. The study also showed that the more
confident superstitious participants were, the better they performed,
perhaps due to self-efficacy — the belief in one’s ability to succeed at
a specific challenge — which has been linked to how willing people are
to persist at a given task.
13. Or maybe brains trump beliefs: In
1974, researchers in the state of Georgia found smart high school
students were less superstitious than those of average intelligence.
14. Is superstition for the birdbrained?
In the 1940s, B. F. Skinner gave eight pigeons food at fixed intervals.
Between feedings, six repeated the behavior they were doing when the
food first appeared, which Skinner likened to card players’ lucky
rituals.
15. Charms or rituals may boost
confidence, but an “unlucky” number can nix it. In 1993, researchers
near London reported that, over a three-year period, highway traffic was
lighter on Friday the 13th than on Friday the 6th. Yet, inexplicably,
on the 13th, road accidents sent 52 percent more people to hospitals.
16. Superstition can be even uglier. In
2009, Interpol calculated the lifetime incidence of rape for South
African women at 1 in 2, with nearly half of victims younger than 18,
likely due to a myth that sex with a virgin can cure a man of AIDS.
17. Does stress create superstition?
After the 1991 Gulf War, a Tel Aviv psychologist found that Israelis in
cities attacked by SCUD missiles were more superstitious than residents
of SCUD-free cities.
18. In 2008, an American study found
participants more likely to perceive connections between unrelated
events when first asked to recall a time when they lacked control.
19. In parts of Asia, many couples plan to have children during “lucky” years.
20. World Bank researchers found
Vietnamese children born in “lucky” years are healthier and better
educated, but possibly because they were born into families emotionally
and financially prepared for them.“Luck” may have had nothing to do with
it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment